Louisville Trust Co. v. Kentucky Nat. Bank
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
BARR, District Judge.
This is a suit brought by the Louisville Trust Company, as general assignee of Thomas & Son, to recover from the Kentucky National Bank usury which is alleged to have been paid that bank. It appears from the allegations of the petition (hat Thomas & Son, who were large whisky dealers in the city of Louisville, on April 18, 1894, made a general assignment to the plaintiff, the trust company, for the benefit of their creditors, assigning and transferring to it all of their properly of every description, choses in action, etc., except such property as is exempt from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Osborn v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Danforth v. National State Bank of ElizabethCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Charles A. Riley Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Waldner v. Bowden State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Wenck v. Insurance Agents Fin. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Hagan Et Vir. v. NeebSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- McCarthy v. First National Bank of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.