Legal Opinion

Lee v. Peerless Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1965No. 10356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADNEY, Judge.

This is an action ex delicto seeking damages for personal injuries brought by Ben M. Lee against Merle F. Kimmerly, Jr., doing business as Sak’s Lounge in Bossier City, Louisiana, and his insurer, Peerless Insurance Company. The defendants filed an exception of no cause of action based on plaintiff’s contributory negligence, which, exceptors urge, is affirmatively alleged in the petition. The trial court sustained the exception and the plaintiff has appealed.

The only matter for inquiry presented on this appeal is whether the petition of the plaintiff discloses such contributory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. SaiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. McAllister v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Begnaud v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. Pence v. KetchumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Lee v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  4. Lee v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  5. Lee v. Peerless Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API