Legal Opinion

Williams v. KIPP Minnesota

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 24, 2024No. 0:23-cv-02200Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA RODERICK WILLIAMS, Civil No. 23-2200 (JRT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KIPP MINNESOTA, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR Defendant. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Eric D. Satre, SATRE LAW FIRM, International Plaza, 7900 International Drive, Suite 300-7044, Bloomington, MN 55425, for Plaintiff. Dalia Istephanous and John P. Edison, RUPP, ANDERSON, SQUIRES & WALDSPURGER, 333 South Seventh Street, Suite 2800, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Defendant. Plaintiff Roderick Williams was terminated by KIPP Minnesota…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned MediaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API