Legal Opinion

Symonds v. Mercury Savings and Loan Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1990No. B047670PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff Fran Symonds appeals from the order of dismissal in her action against defendants Mercury Savings and Loan Association (Mercury) and Debra Winthrop. We conclude the trial court erred in sustaining the defendants’ demurrer in its entirety and reverse.

Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below

In accord with the governing standard of review, the factual allegations contained in appellant’s complaint are deemed admitted by defendants’ demurrer. (White v. Davis (1975) 13 Cal.3d 757, 765 [533 P.2d 222]; Maheu v. CBS, Inc. (1988) 201 Cal.App.3d 662, 669-670 [247 Cal.Rptr.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kruse v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bowden v. Spiegel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. Ross v. Creel Printing & Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. AVANTA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. ShupakMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FSI, Financial Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API