Legal Opinion

Sapp v. El Paso County Department of Human Services

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2008No. 06CA2291PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Plaintiffs, Arthur and Helen Sapp, appeal the district court's judgment affirming the final ageney decision of defendant, the Colorado Department of Human Services (DHS), denying the Sapps' request for nonrecurring adoption expenses and adoption assistance payments. The Sapps' request for adoption subsidies was initially denied by defendant, El Paso County Department of Human Services (county department). We affirm.

I. Background

In late 2001 or early 2002, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (Texas Department) removed the subject minor children,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. C.Z.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Schlapp ex rel. Schlapp v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & FinancingColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Chase v. Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Gandy v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Res., Inc. v. Colo. Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API