State v. Munger
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge
Appellant Rickford Munger challenges his conviction on the ground the district court erred in refusing to allow him to impeach a witness with evidence of a prior conviction of giving a false statement, arguing that the witness’s conviction was not stale. He also claims the district court erred in imposing a 68-month sentence that is to be served consecutively to his sentences for prior felony convictions, arguing that the court cannot increase his sentence both durationally and with respect to consecutive service unless severe aggravating factors are present. We affirm.
FACT…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. NunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Karaczewski v. Farbman Stein & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Santiago v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Vickla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Dwayne BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.