Carrow v. Carrow
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
741 So.2d 200 (1999)
Jimmie Rogers CARROW
v.
Betty Jean CARROW.
No. 97-CA-00713-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
January 28, 1999.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 1999.
William T. Reed, Pascagoula, Attorney for Appellant.
Claude V. Bilbo, Jr., Pascagoula, Dean Holleman, Gulfport, Attorneys for Appellee.
EN BANC.
BANKS, Justice, for the Court:
¶ 1. On remand from a previous appeal,[1] the chancery court re-evaluated distribution of the marital assets in light of Ferguson v. Ferguson and Chamblee v. Chamblee as mandated by this Court in Carrow I. We conclude that the present distribution was an equitable one,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Chamblee v. ChambleeMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Carrow v. CarrowMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Draper v. DraperMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Singley v. SingleyMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Owen v. OwenMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Phillips v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Memphis Hardwood Flooring Co. v. DanielMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Waring v. WaringMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.