Legal Opinion · Dissent
State v. Bates
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1988No. TC J86-1110; CA A42141; SC S35587PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1DissentLinde, J.
The issue that defendant, whose confession was used in convicting him of burglary, wants this court to review is whether a police officer compelled his confession by “threatening” to question and possibly implicate defendant’s mother and brother. The Court of Appeals dealt with this claim by stating:
“We presume, therefore, that the officer threatened to question defendant’s relatives about the burglary, which he had a right to do. His ‘threat’ did not constitute coercion and does not render defendant’s subsequent statements involuntary. See State v. Medenbach, 48 Or App 133, 138, 616 P2d 543…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. MedenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. BoppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HogelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990