Legal Opinion

Hinton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1939No. 19937Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant cites Ah Kee v. State, 34 S. W. 269, as supporting his contention that the evidence complained of in bills of exception numbers ten, eleven, twelve and thirteen was not admissible upon the second count charging that appellant kept and exhibited a gaming table and bank upon which count conviction was had. If that had been the only charge in the present indictments as it was in Ah Kee’s case we think it would have been controlling here. However, as pointed out in the original opinion the first count in the indictment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vineyard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Threadgill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Arbuthnot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Raulie, Alias Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Thornton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API