Raulie, Alias Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for robbery; punishment, twenty years in the penitentiary.
There are a number of bills of exception in the record. There was objection to the introduction of appellant’s confes sion on the ground that same could only be used in connection with a trial for the substantive offense stated in the warning given to appellant, as that charged against him. In other words, it appears that in said warning it was stated that appellant was charged with being an accessory to assault to murder, while on the instant trial he was tried for robbery, hence the confession was not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coomer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Knuckles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Pretre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- United States v. StrouthDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
- Hinton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.