Legal Opinion

Stocksdale v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County. (Moss, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

The appellant sued Thomas S. Jones and Frances S. Jones on the common counts. There was a demand for a bill of particulars, and one was filed as follows: “To* money loaned to defendants by plaintiff’s intestate, to wit: on or about November 13, 1914, $500.00, on or about November 30, 1914, $1,800. And to interest thereon.” At a later term leave was granted the plaintiff to amend the bill of particulars and an amended one was filed. In place of the language used above it read: “To money received by the defendants from the plaintiff’s intestate, to wit;” and then follows the amounts as stated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1833
  2. Parr v. State ex rel. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  3. Harris v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. Brashears v. OrmeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Cairnes v. PeltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Owings v. DayhoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  3. Goff v. RichardsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Jersey Boulevard Corp. v. Lerner Stores Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API