Legal Opinion
Walters v. Dock Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1928PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In Banc. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal for the alleged reason that the transcript was not filed within the time required by law. The transcript, now on file, indicates that an undertaking on appeal was filed June 17th. No objection being made thereto, the appeal was perfected on June 22d. Appellant then had thirty days to…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Hess v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Wood v. HoneymanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Meadowdale Neighborhood Committee v. City of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- McKay v. Pacific Building Materials Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.