Legal Opinion
Layman v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 6, 1984No. 84-778PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
455 So.2d 607 (1984)
Dianne Janney LAYMAN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 84-778.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
September 6, 1984.
Larry Mark Polsky, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
COWART, Judge.
By petition for certiorari we are asked to review the appellate decision of the circuit court affirming, without opinion, the conviction of petitioner in the county court.
We have exercised discretion[1] and have reviewed the issues presented. We hold that section…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Whirley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoenisch v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Sisson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- State v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Hope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Ivory v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.