Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Textron, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings as to the first cause of action which sounds in prima facie tort. The specific claim is that plaintiff had a contract with defendant to act as the latter’s sales agent and that defendant breached the contract, terminating the agency for the sole purpose of doing plaintiff harm. The complaint is attacked on two grounds, first, that there is no allegation of special *530damage and, second, that the allegations of malevolent purpose are mere conclusions. These two grounds really merge into one. The region of prima facie tort is largely unchartered ; at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Reinforce, Inc. v. BirneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Faulk v. Aware, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noel v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API