Legal Opinion

Brisk v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-2402-CIVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NESBITT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this Memorandum Opinion, the Court addresses the following question: When a defendant, who is accused by a plaintiff in a § 1983 1 suit of violating his fourth and fourteenth amendment rights, raises the defense of “qualified immunity” at a trial where many factual issues material to the defense remain in dispute, who should resolve the qualified immunity issue — judge or jury? 2 Because the Eleventh Circuit has never squarely addressed this issue and because the Circuits are split as to who should make this determination, 3 the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James White v. Hezikiah Walker, X Bonding Company, and Town of Verona, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Tucker v. ReshaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Adams v. LindseyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  4. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API