Brisk v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NESBITT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this Memorandum Opinion, the Court addresses the following question: When a defendant, who is accused by a plaintiff in a § 1983 1 suit of violating his fourth and fourteenth amendment rights, raises the defense of “qualified immunity” at a trial where many factual issues material to the defense remain in dispute, who should resolve the qualified immunity issue — judge or jury? 2 Because the Eleventh Circuit has never squarely addressed this issue and because the Circuits are split as to who should make this determination, 3 the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James White v. Hezikiah Walker, X Bonding Company, and Town of Verona, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Tucker v. ReshaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Adams v. LindseyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999