Hanebuth v. Patton
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knous
In a remedial proceeding initiated by defendant in error in the district court under the provisions of Rule 106(a)(4) R.C.P. Colo., plaintiffs in error, contrary to their previous administrative action, were ordered to reinstate defendant in error to his former position as patrolman of the first grade in the classified civil service of the police department of the City and County of Denver. Herein plaintiffs in error seek a reversal of that adjudication. For convenience we shall refer to plaintiffs in error as such or by their respective official titles, and to defendant in error as plaintiff.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Carpenter v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- People Ex Rel. Happell v. SischoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Indiana Unemployment Compensation Board v. Benner-Coryell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jack W. Christner v. Poudre Valley Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- McNichols v. Police Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Turner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Tsang v. KanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Hanebuth v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946