Legal Opinion

Kaszer v. Comm Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 19, 2002No. 01-1978UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s claim for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits was denied by the Social Security Administration, but was granted by the District Court. Subsequently, the court granted Appellee’s Motion for Clarification and amended its order to correct a clerical error involving the date Appellant’s benefits should commence. Appellant challenges that order. We will vacate in part and remand because we find the agency reopened Appellant’s first application.

I

Appellant, Ann A. Kaszer, has twice filed for disability insurance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Bradley Lewis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Hattie Dixon v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ORMON v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  2. HEISEY v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. HEISEY v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. LONG v. SAULDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Rivera v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API