Legal Opinion
HEISEY v. BERRYHILL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 23, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00324Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW HEISEY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of : NO. 20-324 Social Security1 : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ELIZABETH T. HEY, U.S.M.J. November 23, 2020 Matthew Heisey (“Plaintiff”) seeks review of the Commissioner’s decision denying his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). For the reasons that follow, I conclude that the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is supported by substantial evidence and will affirm. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bradley Lewis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Lisa Schaudeck v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.