Legal Opinion

In re M.A.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 28, 2011No. 09-081PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendant, M.A., appeals a district court order placing him in the custody of the Commissioner of Disability, Aging and Independent Living (DAIL). Defendant had been charged with sexual assault and lewd or lascivious conduct with a child, but was ruled incompetent to stand trial. The district court found, under 18 V.S.A. § 8839,1 that defendant presented a danger of harm to others, was “ ‘in need of custody, care and habilitation’ ” and that the Commissioner could provide defendant placement in a program meeting defendant’s needs. Defendant contends the order must be vacated for lack of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. Soucy v. Soucy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Rothberg v. OlenikSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Leo ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. In Re MASupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. State v. Michael Sinquell-Gainey & David VazSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  4. Michael Sinquell-Gainey and David VazSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  5. Sandy Bigglestone, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation, solely as Liquidator of Global Hawk Insurance Company Risk Retention Group v. Crowe LLPDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API