In re Edwards
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Laura K. Grandy, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on the Trustees’ motions for instructions regarding the proper treatment of post-petition wages held by the trustee at the time of a confirmed Chapter 13 case’s dismissal, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1829, 191 L.Ed.2d 783 (2015). For the reasons stated below, the Court holds that the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) requires that such wages be returned to the debtor.
Facts
The relevant facts in these cases are not in dispute. In each case: (1) the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. ViegelahnSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In Re: Barry L. Michael v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Branigan v. BatemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- In re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- In Re ParrishDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jeffrey P. White & Associates, P.C. v. Fessenden (Wheaton)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2016
- Viegelahn v. Lopez (In Re Lopez)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- In re GonzalesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- In re DemeryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2017
- In re HooksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.