Hearne v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant-movant relies on plaintiff’s allegation that plaintiff was the owner of and passenger in an automobile which was negligently driven by Walter Ivey Smith so as to proximately cause a collision and resulting injury and damage to plaintiff. Defendant then moves for summary judgment on the grounds that as a result of plaintiff’s capacity as owner and status as passenger, Walter Ivey Smith’s negligence is imputed to him, thereby making plaintiff contributorily negligent as a matter of law.
“In North Carolina, negligence is imputed to the owner-occupant of an automobile…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Etheridge v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Rhoads v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Bohin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Oxendine v. BowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990