Legal Opinion

Hearne v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1974No. 7419SC625PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant-movant relies on plaintiff’s allegation that plaintiff was the owner of and passenger in an automobile which was negligently driven by Walter Ivey Smith so as to proximately cause a collision and resulting injury and damage to plaintiff. Defendant then moves for summary judgment on the grounds that as a result of plaintiff’s capacity as owner and status as passenger, Walter Ivey Smith’s negligence is imputed to him, thereby making plaintiff contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

“In North Carolina, negligence is imputed to the owner-occupant of an automobile…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Etheridge v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Rhoads v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Bohin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Oxendine v. BowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API