Legal Opinion

Victor v. Sell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1974No. 44400PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a personal injury action from an order of the district court denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff, who tried the case primarily on a theory of trespass, contends on appeal that the trial court erred in three respects: In defining trespass, in explaining intent, and in giving any instructions at all on contributory negligence, and assumption of risk. We affirm.

Plaintiff, Hugo Victor, and defendants Donald and Estelle Sell are next-door neighbors. During the weekend of February 6, 1971, the plumbing in the Sell house…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. StangvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Muenkel v. MuenkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Schumann v. McGinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. JBG/Twinbrook Metro Ltd. Partnership v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API