Legal Opinion

Rossi v. McCloskey and Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1957No. Civ. A. 19204PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

In this action, brought by plaintiffs-under the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., the defendants have moved to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure-to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure of the plaintiffs to comply with the order of court, requiring submission of the second amended complaint within twenty days.

The plaintiffs are truck drivers, members of the defendant Local 470 (four officers of which are also defendants), and erstwhile employees of the defendant, McCloskey and Company, a Philadelphia…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Lester R. Cooper and Allstate Insurance Company v. American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Edward Dunbar O'Brien v. Frank SinatraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Parmelee Transportation Company v. KeeshinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
  5. Bolick-Gillman Company v. Continental Baking CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API