Legal Opinion
City of Fairmont v. Sjostrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1968No. 40662PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Martin County finding defendant, Carl B. Sjostrom, guilty of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of Fairmont Ordinance No. 447, § 2.
Defendant was first charged in the probate court of Martin County, municipal court division, with violating the ordinance and was convicted of so doing after a jury trial. On appeal to the district court and a trial de novo at which he waived a jury trial, he was again convicted.
If all conflicts in the evidence are resolved in favor of the city, the prevailing party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- McGowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Flemming v. ThorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van Zant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Carter v. Olmsted County HousingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Wadena v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. TrezonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Independent School District No. 181 v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.