Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 25, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01778Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Nos. CV-18-1157-PHX-DGC 10 Hilary Davis, CV-18-1159-PHX-DGC CV-18-1778-PHX-DGC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 McKesson Corporation, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment in these cases. The motions 18 are fully briefed, and no party has requested oral argument. See Docs. 225, 228, 229. 19 The Court will grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants.1 20 Defendants’ motion is based on the Court’s previous ruling excluding Plaintiffs’ 21 general causation experts under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Anne Ruggiero, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company and Parke Davis, Docket No. 04-6674-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Linda Messick v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API