Muniz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BAIRD, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and punishment was assessed at eight years confinement, probated, a fine of $1,000.00 and 200 hours of community service. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Muniz v. State, 844 S.W.2d 260 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992). Appellant’s petition for discretionary review contends the search warrant and subsequent search were violative of the Texas Constitution. Such contentions, although raised separately from those based on the United States Constitution, were not addressed by the Court of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weatherford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ikner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Muniz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Manning v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
- Earbin, Lennie P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997