Legal Opinion

Ikner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1993No. 007-93, 008-93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

The trial judge convicted appellant of resisting arrest and driving while intoxicated. Initially, the Court of Appeals affirmed but later, after the filing of appellant’s petition for discretionary review, on its own motion pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 101, withdrew its earlier opinion and reversed the convictions. Ikner v. State, 848 S.W.2d 162 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1992). The State now petitions for review contending the Court of Appeals erred by not addressing the State’s argument that appellant had not preserved the error for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Ikner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Muniz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Cardwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Lesley Esther Diamond v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  5. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API