Quire v. City of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether an employer who properly intervenes pursuant *372to General Statutes § 31-293 (a)1 in an action brought by its employee against a municipality under General *373Statutes § 13a-149,* 2 the “highway defect” statute, may obtain reimbursement from the municipality for workers’ compensation payments made to the employee for injuries suffered by the employee as a result of a defective highway. The defendant, the city of Stamford, moved for summary judgment on the complaint of the intervening plaintiff, United Parcel Service (UPS), and the trial court granted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Aerotec Corp. v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bellman v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Goodyear v. DiscalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Champion Steel, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.