Legal Opinion

Ricketts v. Adamson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1987No. 86-6PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

483 U.S. 1 (1987)

RICKETTS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

v.

ADAMSON

No. 86-6.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 1, 1987

Decided June 22, 1987

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

William J. Schafer III argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona, and Jack Roberts, Assistant Attorney General.

Roy T. Englert, Jr., argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. On the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Weld, Deputy…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · White; Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Armando Ybarra v. M. StainerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Candace Fox v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API