Legal Opinion · Dissent

Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2017No. 12-55911Published

1DissentCallahan, Circuit Judge, joined by O’Scannlain, Tallman, Bybee, Bea, M. Smith, and Ikuta, Circuit Judges,

For the second time in roughly as many weeks, we invite summary reversal by the Supreme Court in a state court habeas case.1 The three-judge panel decision here is not based on clearly established federal law, as the Supreme Court has never held that the Due Process Clause precludes post-plea, pre-judgment amendments to a complaint. Nor has the Supreme Court ever ordered the reinstatement of an alleged plea agreement that was not in effect at the time judgment was entered. Such an exercise of raw federal judiciary power, though, is exactly what the Antiter-rorism and Effective Death Penalty…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API