State v. Gutierrez-Medina
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
*184**81The legislature has directed that a person who is convicted of a crime that resulted in "economic damages" to a victim must pay the victim restitution in "the full amount of the victim's economic damages as determined by the court." ORS 137.106(1)(a). In this case, defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants and assault in the third degree after striking a pedestrian with his car, and the trial court ordered him to pay almost $ 155,000 in restitution for the victim's medical expenses. We allowed review to consider whether the trial court erred in refusing to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Towe v. Sacagawea, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Moreno-HernandezOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Appleyard v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Thomas v. Dillon Family Limited Partnership IICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.