Legal Opinion

Montgomery County, Maryland v. Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1985No. 84-1633PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Montgomery County, Maryland (the “County”) petitions for review of a final decision of the Secretary of Labor (the “Secretary”), which disallowed certain expenditures by the County and its subgrantee under the Comprehensive Employment Training Act (“CETA”) of 1973, Pub.L. No. 93-203, §§ 1 et seq., 87 Stat. 839 (1974), amended by CETA Amendments of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-524, §§ 1 et seq., 92 Stat. 1909 (1978) (repealed 1982), 1 and required repayment of those funds out of non-grant monies. We affirm.

I

The County was a prime CETA sponsor from October 1, 1978, through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Oakland, a Municipal Corporation v. Secretary Raymond Donovan, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. State of South Carolina v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. In the Matter of City of St. Louis, Missouri v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Colorado Department of Labor and Employment v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Louisiana, Department of Labor v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API