Romeo v. Schmid

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting a stay of enforcement of the judgment awarded by this Court on the prior appeal in this matter (Romeo v Schmidt, 229 AD2d 992, Iv dismissed 89 NY2d 1086; see, CPLR 2201; Michaelson Assocs. v Soifer, 182 AD2d 503, 505). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.—Stay.) Present—Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.