Legal Opinion

Romeo v. Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1996No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from order insofar as it granted summary judgment on first cause of action unanimously dismissed, cross appeal from order insofar as it stayed execution of judgment dismissed and order modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We dismiss defendants’ appeal from that portion of the order granting plaintiff Robert D. Romeo summary judgment on the first cause of action; defendants’ appeal from the final judgment brings up for review that portion of the order (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; CPLR 5501…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Whitehead v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v. NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Corcoran Group, Inc. v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Romeo v. SchmidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Romeo v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API