Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Didiano v. Beshara

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 93-2406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In Didiano I, we prevented the commission from stopping permanent total disability compensation without a finding that claimant was no longer permanently and totally disabled. The commission has since made such a finding. Among the objections to that determination is claimant’s assertion that the finding is unsupported by “some evidence.” Upon review, we concur.

Claimant’s cessation of permanent total disability compensation was premised on the reports of five physicians. Because the commission relied on the reports of Drs. Moorstein, Vamvas and Steurer in support of its original permanent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Zamora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kent State Univ. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Davis v. Hammer Graphics, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State ex rel. Didiano v. BesharaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. Bureau of Work. Cmp. Rehab., 06ap-692 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API