Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Crotty v. Zangerle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1938No. 26933Published

1DissentGorman, J.

The provisions of the Ogrin Act (Section 2590-1, General Code, 116 Ohio Laws, 468) are so inextricably dependent iipon the validity of the so-called Whittemore Acts that if they are disassociated entirely, it is impossible to ascertain the true intent of the Legislature.

The first Whittemore Act (115 Ohio Laws, 161) became effective April 5, .1933. It provided that a delinquent taxpayer, by paying all current taxes and agreeing to discharge the delinquent taxes in installments would be relieved of the payment of past penalties and interest. At each session of the Legislature the benefits of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API