Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Fried

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 23, 1947No. 168, Docket 20466Published

1DissentAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

All members of the court agree as to the validity of the searches and seizures. I dissent from the holding of the *466majority that the confession, if invalidly obtained, should be suppressed in advance of trial. Any injustice the petitioners would suffer in case an invalid confession should be used as a basis for an indictment is no greater than they might have to suffer from the consideration by the grand jury of other incompetent evidence. Such danger of injustice is, in my opinion, outweighed by the objection to imposing upon district attorneys the burden of opposing motions to suppress…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Kokenes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. The People v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Eastus v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API