Knowles v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BARTEAU, Judge.
Steven Knowles appeals his conviction, following trial by jury, of dealing in cocaine in excess of three (8) grams, a class A felony.2 We have restated the issues raised as follows:(1) Whether the discovery of the cocaine was the result of an impermissible search and seizure?(2) Whether there was sufficient evidence of Knowles' intent to deal to support the conviction.
FACTS
Special agent Lawrence Lillig, of the Indianapolis office of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration, received a telephone call from Robert Johnson, also a DEA agent. Johnson called from the Atlanta…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thurman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sellmer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Finger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Knowles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991