Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tylwalk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1978No. 395PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the lower court’s order suppressing chemical tests because they were deemed to have been performed too long after a fatal accident in which appellee was allegedly involved. We reverse the order of the lower court and remand the case for trial.

It is the Commonwealth’s position that without the suppressed evidence the prosecution will be substantially handicapped and that “the suppressed evidence may well mark the difference between conviction and acquittal of the defendant.” (Appellant’s brief at 8). Therefore, the order before us is ripe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Schwarzbach v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. DerenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. TrefrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpeightsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. AriziniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Cusatis v. ReichertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. KostraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API