Legal Opinion
City of Roswell v. Holmes
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1939No. 4483PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from an order of dismissal “with prejudice” under the provisions of Ch. 121, L. 1937, as to seven of more than fifty defendants in a paving lien foreclosure proceeding.
Ch. 121, L. 1937, is as follows:
“Section 1. In any civil action or proceeding pending in any district court in this state, when it shall be made to appear to the court that the plaintiff therein or any defendant filing a cross-complaint therein has failed to take any action to bring such action or proceeding to its final determination for a period of at .least two-years after the filing of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hannah v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Stockard v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. BrookenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Schwartz v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- Bishop v. McGillisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Anaya v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Martin v. Leonard Motor-El PasoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Molybdenum Corp. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.