Legal Opinion
Deschamps v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. Salaried Employees Retirement Plan
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 9, 2015No. Civil No. 3:12-cv-86PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Andre Deschamps filed a motion concerning his claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq, and North Carolina state law. (Docket Nos. 58, 59, 60.) Defendants Bridgestone Americas, Inc., et al., did the same. (Docket Nos. 66, 67, 68.) Both parties move for summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims.
For the reasons stated, the Court will GRANT Plaintiffs motion with respect to his claims for equitable estoppel, breach of *741fidu…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coutu v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Macri v. Wright TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Select Specialty Hospital-Memphis, Inc. v. The Trustees of the Langston Companies, Inc. Benefit ProgramDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020