Legal Opinion
Spring v. Broadnax
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mahoney, P. J.
An understanding of the challenged actions taken by respondent Commissioner of Civil Service (hereinafter the Commissioner) necessitates a brief review of the actions taken by the Commissioner following separate litigation which annulled a civil service eligibility list and vacated appointments from that list (see, Matter of Chiles v Burstein, 137 AD2d 81). In January 1983 the Department of Civil Service administered a test for candidates for the position of treatment team leader. Petitioners herein, employees of the Office of Mental Health and the Office of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Palmer v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Martin v. RonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ass'n of Secretaries to Justices of the Supreme & Surrogate's Courts v. Office of Court AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bellacosa v. Classification Review Board of Unified Court SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alonge v. CarnavaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Fiffe v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999