Legal Opinion

Henry v. Knights & Daughters of Tabor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the court below, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it did not state a cause of action.

The allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiffs are the sole heirs at law of one Annie Porter, whose life was insured in the defendant insurance company for the sum of $300, payable upon her death to her husband, Robert Porter, and that the beneficiary had wilfully murdered the insured, thereby forfeiting his. right to the proceeds of the insurance certificate, and defendant had, after demand so to do, failed to pay plaintiffs, as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. ShaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Johnston v. Metropolitan Life Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Baker v. Mosaic TemplarsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Delony v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. ShaddingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. TilleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Cooper v. KrischSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Mosson v. Woodmen of UnionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Motor Contract Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API