Legal Opinion
State v. Dunbar
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2016No. CAAP-15-0000063PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
GINOZA, J.
Defendant-Appellee John P. Dunbar, Jr. (Dunbar) was charged in this case with Failure to Provide Specimen For Forensic Identification, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 844D~31(a) (2014) and § 844D-111(a) (2014).1 Plaintiff-Appellant State of Hawai'i (State) asserts that Dunbar, having been convicted of a felony offense in 2006, and after having received written notice in 2014 from the collecting agency of his obligation to provide a buccal swab sample,2 failed in 2014 to provide a buccal swab for the collection of his deoxyribonucleic acid…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. DudoitHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. EntrekinHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Galima v. Association of Apartment Owners of Palm CourtDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Trs. of the Estate of Bishop v. AuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2019