Raheem Anderson v. Paul Perez
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
RESTREPO, Circuit Judge.
Raheem Anderson appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for Philadelphia Police Detective Paul Perez in Anderson’s suit for false arrest, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, false light invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because Anderson does not present a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Perez’s affidavit supporting the warrant application established probable cause, and because Perez did not recklessly .disregard the truth or engage in willful misconduct, we will affirm.
I
As we write for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alexandra Chavarriaga v. State of NJ Department of CorrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Groman v. Township Of ManalapanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Orsatti v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION v. PRIMROSE PHARMACY, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- LEWIS v. HERRERIASDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- PINKNEY v. MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- WRIGHT v. COUNTY OF CAMDENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023