Legal Opinion

PINKNEY v. MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00167Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) KOBE PINKNEY, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-167 ) Plaintiff ) Vv. ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) RICHARD A. LANZILLO MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA, et al, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants ) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS ) TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) [ECF NOS. 53, 55, 57 & 59] ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER L. Introduction Having granted Plaintiff Kobe Pinkney’s Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment as to certain claims within this Court’s federal question jurisdiction, the Coutt is now obliged to reach the merits…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API