Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Fish
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 14, 1988No. 88-092PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Robert and Margaret Fish (appellants) appeal the Rutland Superior Court’s dismissal, as untimely filed, of their appeal to that court from an order of the Town of Pittsford Board of Adjustment (the Board). We vacate that order of dismissal and the related approval of appellees’ conditional use permit and remand to the Rutland Superior Court for proceedings on the reinstated appeal, consistent with this opinion.
Appellees Richard and Sandra Conway (applicants) applied to the Pittsford Board of Zoning Adjustment for a conditional use permit to construct a used car sales operation and an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Rutland v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Milton Commons Assoc. v. BD. OF APP. OF MILTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Chang v. PLANNING COM'N OF COUNTY OF MAUIHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- In re Appeal of Grace Building Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Kozub v. Opt'HofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re Appeal of Trahan NovSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Appeal of Newton EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re Appeal of McEwing Services, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In Re Appeal of AshlineSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.