Legal Opinion
United States v. Commercial Am. Barge Line Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 4, 1977No. 76-395A(4)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
424 F.Supp. 453 (1977)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
COMMERCIAL AMERICAN BARGE LINE COMPANY, the M/V JACK D. WOFFORD, its engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., and BARGE ACBL 2748, in rem, Defendants.
No. 76-395A(4).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
January 4, 1977.
Jean C. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, St. Louis, Mo., Rosemary Denson, Trial Atty., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Admiralty & Shipping Section, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
Fritz Faerber, Lucas & Murphy, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. And Brown & Root, Inc., Successor to Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. The S/s Hermosa, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in Rem, Pansuiza Compania De Navigacion S.A., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. the Tug Terry E. BuchananDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- State Of Oregon v. Tug Go-GetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Motor Vessel Gopher StateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Logan & Craig Charter Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Logan & Craig Charter Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Diag Human S.E. v. Czech Republic - Ministry of HCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.