Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boyd v. Ward

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2012No. 2012-0102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Jamie Boyd, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Judge Michael Ward and the Athens County Court of Common Pleas, to resentence him and to take into account his allied offenses of similar import.

{¶ 2} Neither mandamus nor procedendo will issue if the party seeking this extraordinary relief has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Jelinek v. Schneider, 127 Ohio St.3d 332, 2010-Ohio-5986, 939 N.E.2d 847, ¶ 13. Boyd had an adequate remedy by way of appeal to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hudson v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Jelinek v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Hawthorn v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Fernbach v. BrushOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API