State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, William Hudson, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Judge John D. Sutula and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, to resentence him to account for his allied offenses of similar import. Neither mandamus nor procedendo will issue if the party seeking extraordinary relief has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Jelinek v. Schneider, 127 Ohio St.3d 332, 2010-Ohio-5986, 939 N.E.2d 847, ¶ 13. Hudson had an adequate remedy by way of appeal to raise the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Douglas v. BurlewOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Manns v. GansheimerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Jelinek v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Ridenour v. O'Connell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. O'Neal v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Culgan v. KimblerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Culgan v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.